| ...things only get picked apart when you give the ammunition to do so. Abler/Ash etc. refuse to properly frame their test data when they post it. They post apples to oranges data, then make fallacious conclusions. If you want to share data, share data. Frame it properly. If the data is apples to oranges, say as much. "Here is Dyno A and Dyno B - these are fundamentally different setups, so no valid conclusions can be made - but I wanted to provide the data." Ash/Abler have done that exactly *zero* times. Abler's products also get reamed because he gets on here, makes unproven claims, then acts like a complete douche-canoe when people call him on the BS. If you have data, frame it properly, post it, leave the conclusions to the readers. 100% of the issue Ash/Abler have is attempting to think for people who often have a better understanding the science than they do. 90% of the problem is they then get pussy-hurt and start insulting people who refused to accept their fallacious conclusions. That's 190%. Refute me and I'll insult you.
Recursively Yours,
Kenny...
PETZ Member #5
You guys rock socks. (Click for pie-chart)
Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes.
- EW Dijkstra
|
